A Few Random Thoughts About the 9mm Charter Revolver

I note that Charter Arms has finally brought their 9mm snubbie revolver, the Pitbull, to market. I’ve been sort of half-way pondering where this revolver sits in the Cosmic Scheme of Self-Defense Thingies since Charter announced the little gun. It’s obviously not the first — both S&W 940 and the Ruger SP-101 fell into the 9mm snub; neither are in current production, which should tell you a bit about the demand. Taurus still catalogs their tiny 905 9mm revolver, essentially the size of an old S&W “I” frame, the small frame revolvers that, I believe, predated the “J” frame. If I recall, my friends found the little Taurus crazy accurate.

Still, strangely enough, I think the Charter 9mm may have a viable place in the self-defense hierarchy, especially post-Aurora. Essentially, it can fill the “second gun” role for CCW holders who carry a 9mm as their primary weapon. I recently saw on one of the gun forums a list of “well known gun people” (for lack of better, or at least funnier, words) who had moved to the 9mm. It’s a pretty interesting list.

As you know, in my Panteao Productions CONCEALED CARRY video, I wholesale recommend the 9mm as the choice for newbie CCWs. So far, no one has thrown any tomatoes, brickbats or cast iron skillets at me for that recommendation. You all know I’m a fan of the pocket pistol, most notably the Ruger LCP .380, everybody’s universal pocket pistol. I do like the LC9 and some of the other mini-blasters, but they’re a bit of a stretch for the pocket.

That’s the role I think the Pitbull fits in…primary 9mm on the hip; secondary 9mm in the pocket. Snubs are great pocket pistols. As Walt Rauch has said many times, their weaknesses are their strengths. In a good pocket holster, they don’t “print” as bad like a small semiauto because of their round lines. I like the Rimless Cartridge Extractor System because loaded full moon clips in the pocket suck…sooner or later you’ll bend them enough so they won’t work. QuickStrips from Tuff Products come in a 9mm version, although sadly not in pink, and they are wonderful products.

One of the primary functions (at least in my mind) of a civilian carrying the second pistol is the ability to arm someone else if the situation becomes necessary. I think that the Aurora active shooter points this out even more strongly. In that situation, if I have “gone to ground,” that is, if I’ve stuffed myself and a spousal unit (or innocent bystander) into a hidey-hole, I want to be able to arm said spouse or even bystander with my second gun. Should the aggressor return, I want that aggressor to be met with a hail of bullets. A two-gun hailstorm is better than a one-gun hailstorm.

Okay, says you, that scenario works whether the second gun is a semiauto or revolver or even some bizarre derringer. Yes, it does. But if I am carrying that second gun with an eye toward possibly arming an accomplice, I have GOT to go lowest common denominator on the manual of arms and with the HIGHEST reliability factor. You are welcome to argue with me all you want, but I have been an instructor and in competition for a long time. The most common firearm jam in the world is limp-wristing a semi…period…exclamation point…so there! My experience has been the little semis are even more susceptible than their big brothers (sisters?) to that very problem. Might a less experienced, or even non-experienced, person be more prone to making that mistake, especially under the hellish stress of an active shooter encounter? Duh…

A revolver, OTOH, will fire if you’re holding it with your teeth. You are not part of the fire control system of a revolver in the same way you are with a semi.

Early this summer I spent a while just carrying a Ruger LCR snub .38+P, and it worked just as well as it has always worked. Obviously, you can carry a second snubby revolver in any caliber and accomplish what I’m suggesting here. However, I do like ammo interchangeability with the primary gun…then we all have ammo, should we need to share. Unlikely? You betcha! But things tend to be the way they are until they’re not…unlikely things don’t happen until they do. Mr. Murphy is always lurking in the wings.

Secondly, the reason I chose the 9mm for concealed carry is I like the self-defense choices in that caliber, especially the Corbon DPX…it’s jello performance borders on amazing. If you forced me to carry any of the premium self-defense rounds (a big shout-out here to Hornady Critical Defense), I wouldn’t feel under-gunned.

2 Responses to A Few Random Thoughts About the 9mm Charter Revolver

  1. John Boyd

    August 4, 2012 at 10:20 am

    Carried 5 shot rev. for years in pocket holster. Big fan of speed loaders, other than strips, what options for the Charter Arms 9mm? Also curious about velocity. Had S&W 9mm 5 shot years ago, info at the time was that velocity was higher with 9mm compared to 38 spec. since it’s short length allowed pressure peak in cylinder not so much loss at barrel-cylinder gap.

  2. Paul Cochran

    August 19, 2013 at 10:37 am

    I have one of these for the very same reason as you, just because it’s a 9mm gun and I can use the same rounds for it as for my Glock 17. But, of course, I can’t deny that this is one quality built gun that pleases me quite well. I’ve always loved the look of a revolver.

Click on a tab to select how you'd like to leave your comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>