{"id":2164,"date":"2010-03-02T10:54:20","date_gmt":"2010-03-02T16:54:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.downrange.tv\/blog\/?p=2164"},"modified":"2010-03-02T10:58:22","modified_gmt":"2010-03-02T16:58:22","slug":"2d-amendment-extension-likely","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.downrange.tv\/blog\/2d-amendment-extension-likely\/2164\/","title":{"rendered":"2d Amendment extension likely"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Just posted on the Scotus Blog:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The Supreme Court on Tuesday seemed poised to require state and local  governments to obey the Second Amendment guarantee of a personal right  to a gun, but with perhaps considerable authority to regulate that  right.\u00a0 The dominant sentiment on the Court was to extend the Amendment  beyond the federal level, based on the 14th Amendment\u2019s guarantee of  \u201cdue process,\u201d since doing so through another part of the 14th Amendment  would raise too many questions about what other rights might emerge.<\/p>\n<p>When the Justices cast their first vote after starting later this  week to discuss where to go from here, it appeared that the focus of  debate will be how extensive a \u201cright to keep and bear arms\u201d should be  spelled out: would it be only some \u201ccore right\u201d to have a gun for  personal safety, or would it include every variation of that right that  could emerge in the future as courts decide specific cases? The liberal  wing of the Court appeared to be making a determined effort to hold the  expanded Amendment in check, but even the conservatives open to applying  the Second Amendment to states, counties and cities seemed ready to  concede some \u2014 but perhaps fewer \u2014 limitations.<\/p>\n<p>The eagerly awaited oral argument in McDonald, et al., v. Chicago, et  al. (08-1521) found all members of the Court actively involved except  the usually silent Justice Clarence Thomas.\u00a0 And, while no one said that  the issue of \u201cincorporating\u201d the Second Amendment into the 14th  Amendment had already been decided before the argument had even begun,  the clear impression was that the Court majority was at least  sentimentally in favor of that, with only the dimensions of the  expansion to be worked out in this case and in a strong of likely  precedents coming as time went on.<\/p>\n<p>An attempt by an attorney for the cities of Chicago and Oak Park,  Ill., defending local bans on handguns in those communities, to prevent  any application of the constitutional gun right to states, counties and  cities looked forlorn and even doomed.\u00a0 The nub of that argument was  that, unlike other constitutional rights that the Court has extended to  the state and local level, the right to a gun recognized by the Court  two years ago in District of Columbia v. Heller pitted the threat that  guns pose to human lives against a constitutional right, so the balance  should be struck differently.\u00a0 So far as the hearing Tuesday showed,  Justice Stephen G. Breyer was the only member of the Court attracted to  that approach.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>During this afternoon and tomorrow, we will post commentaries from Michael Bane, Jim Shepherd, Dave Hardy and others.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Just posted on the Scotus Blog: The Supreme Court on Tuesday seemed poised to require state and local governments to obey the Second Amendment guarantee of a personal right to a gun, but with perhaps considerable authority to regulate that right.\u00a0 The dominant sentiment on the Court was to extend the Amendment beyond the federal [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[58,354],"tags":[263],"class_list":["post-2164","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news-from-the-industry","category-mcdonald-v-city-of-chicago-news","tag-mcdonald-v-chicago"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.downrange.tv\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2164","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.downrange.tv\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.downrange.tv\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.downrange.tv\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/39"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.downrange.tv\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2164"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.downrange.tv\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2164\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.downrange.tv\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2164"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.downrange.tv\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2164"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.downrange.tv\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2164"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}