Author Topic: Silencers  (Read 5648 times)

alfsauve

  • Semper Vigilantes
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6097
  • DRTV Ranger
Silencers
« on: August 14, 2015, 02:19:07 pm »
Thank you. Thank you.   As I've said several times, while "suppressor" may be the current term,  both the patent as well as the NFA refer to them as "silencers."   Of course the great debate will continue regardless.

Nicely done.


The chances of overturning any part of NFA are probably not too great though.  Not to stray too far into political group, but we're always fighting a defense battles at the national level.   I don't hold out hope for any change to NFA in my lifetime.



Will work for ammo
USAF MAC 437th MAW SOG 1968-1972

The Down Range TV Forum

Silencers
« on: August 14, 2015, 02:19:07 pm »

Magoo541

  • Bryan Munson
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1556
Re: Silencers
« Reply #1 on: October 18, 2015, 08:23:20 pm »
Like Michael has stated in one of his Podcasts, this was my all-time-favorite Gun Stories episode.  Well done, indeed!
He who dares wins.  SAS

JC5123

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2574
  • Fortune sides with him who dares.
Re: Silencers
« Reply #2 on: April 25, 2016, 05:44:40 pm »
Can we play the word game against the ATF? I mean right now I have a "suppressor" sitting at my FFL just waiting for the Form 4. Since it is in fact a "suppressor" and not a "silencer", can I just go pick it up now?  ;D
I am a member of my nation's chosen soldiery.
God grant that I may not be found wanting,
that I will not fail this sacred trust.

alfsauve

  • Semper Vigilantes
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6097
  • DRTV Ranger
Re: Silencers
« Reply #3 on: April 25, 2016, 08:53:17 pm »
Good try JC, but regardless of what you call it, the legal definition of what you have is "silencer"
Will work for ammo
USAF MAC 437th MAW SOG 1968-1972

JC5123

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2574
  • Fortune sides with him who dares.
Re: Silencers
« Reply #4 on: April 26, 2016, 04:09:38 pm »
Good try JC, but regardless of what you call it, the legal definition of what you have is "silencer"

So says you! Why don't we ask the Cyclone what IT identifies as? 
I am a member of my nation's chosen soldiery.
God grant that I may not be found wanting,
that I will not fail this sacred trust.

alfsauve

  • Semper Vigilantes
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6097
  • DRTV Ranger
Re: Silencers
« Reply #5 on: April 27, 2016, 04:41:42 am »
So says you! Why don't we ask the Cyclone what IT identifies as?

Oh well then Cyclone better not come to NC. 



If I had an M2 I know it would identify as a mild an meek 20ga upland game o/u shotgun. 
Will work for ammo
USAF MAC 437th MAW SOG 1968-1972

JC5123

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2574
  • Fortune sides with him who dares.
Re: Silencers
« Reply #6 on: April 27, 2016, 11:01:44 am »
Oh well then Cyclone better not come to NC. 



If I had an M2 I know it would identify as a mild an meek 20ga upland game o/u shotgun.

 ;D
I am a member of my nation's chosen soldiery.
God grant that I may not be found wanting,
that I will not fail this sacred trust.