Author Topic: 9 vs 45 vs 40 etc.  (Read 13302 times)

Strider

  • Very Active Forum Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 112
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
9 vs 45 vs 40 etc.
« on: August 04, 2015, 10:42:10 PM »
Ok everyone. I have come to a crossroads. Full disclosure, I have been a .45 guy all my life. Cut my teeth on them. But I gotta admit that modern ammo has really closed the gap. I have made the switch to 9mm on most of my platforms. Give my access to shooting reports and anecdotal evidence, I am a convert. Other than very heavy winter clothing, The differences are nil.
Semper Fi

alfsauve

  • Semper Vigilantes
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7198
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 453
Re: 9 vs 45 vs 40 etc.
« Reply #1 on: August 05, 2015, 05:43:54 AM »
We also have cookies here on the dark side.
Will work for ammo
USAF MAC 437th MAW 1968-1972

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: 9 vs 45 vs 40 etc.
« Reply #2 on: August 05, 2015, 06:25:25 AM »
Well, 9 mm, has been good enough for European's for 100 years, and the French have certainly drop tested them extensively.

Big Frank

  • NRA Benefactor Member
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9553
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1073
Re: 9 vs 45 vs 40 etc.
« Reply #3 on: August 05, 2015, 04:11:48 PM »
Some 9mm +P ammo is as powerful as some .45 ACP standard loads but a .45 makes bigger holes. My Para Ordnance .45s have magazine capacities of 10 - 15 rounds, 20 in the extended mags. If I can't hit what I'm aiming at with 10-15 rounds the additional few rounds a 9mm gives me wouldn't be of much use. Plus I like +P ammo in my .45s that is more powerful than any 9mm +P.
""It may be laid down as a primary position, and the basis of our system, that every Citizen who enjoys the protection of a free Government, owes not only a proportion of his property, but even his personal services to the defence of it, and consequently that the Citizens of America (with a few legal and official exceptions) from 18 to 50 Years of Age should be borne on the Militia Rolls, provided with uniform Arms, and so far accustomed to the use of them, that the Total strength of the Country might be called forth at a Short Notice on any very interesting Emergency." - George Washington. Letter to Alexander Hamilton, Friday, May 02, 1783

THE RIGHT TO BUY WEAPONS IS THE RIGHT TO BE FREE - A. E. van Vogt, The Weapon Shops of Isher

billt

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6760
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 454
Re: 9 vs 45 vs 40 etc.
« Reply #4 on: January 05, 2016, 09:26:02 AM »
Ok everyone. I have come to a crossroads. Full disclosure, I have been a .45 guy all my life. Cut my teeth on them. But I gotta admit that modern ammo has really closed the gap. I have made the switch to 9mm on most of my platforms......

I agree, and have done much the same. I'm still a big advocate of the .45 ACP, but most all of my handgun purchases in the last 5 years have been 9 MM by a 2 to 1 margin. The 9 MM has a lot going for it. Most notably is cost. It's about 70% less than .45 ACP, comparing Ball to Ball. Today, 9 MM Ball is again available for around $10.00 a box. About the cheapest I've found reloadable .45 ACP Ball is $17.00+. Some higher, very few lower.

And in high performance self defense ammo, the 9 MM has improved leaps and bounds. So has the .45 ACP. But today's modern high performance 9 MM's are right up there with stopping ability. Back in the 70's you couldn't give me one. Today I love them.

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: 9 vs 45 vs 40 etc.
« Reply #5 on: Today at 05:55:11 AM »

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: 9 vs 45 vs 40 etc.
« Reply #5 on: January 05, 2016, 01:11:17 PM »
Bullets are bullets, it's placement that matters.

Magoo541

  • Bryan Munson
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1566
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: 9 vs 45 vs 40 etc.
« Reply #6 on: January 05, 2016, 02:05:54 PM »
I think a lot of people are making the move from 45 to 9.  My next pistol will be 9mm, probably a G19 too-the even darker side.

I will still shoot my XDM 45 in USPSA Limited 10, maybe even Limited if I get some mag extensions (Canyon Creek says 18 rounds). 

For now I still carry my XDS in 45, because I have it.
He who dares wins.  SAS

billt

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6760
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 454
Re: 9 vs 45 vs 40 etc.
« Reply #7 on: January 05, 2016, 02:42:05 PM »
I even bought a 9 MM AR-15 a while back!






tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: 9 vs 45 vs 40 etc.
« Reply #8 on: January 05, 2016, 02:53:27 PM »
What about splitting the difference with .40 ?

billt

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6760
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 454
Re: 9 vs 45 vs 40 etc.
« Reply #9 on: January 06, 2016, 06:41:22 AM »
What about splitting the difference with .40 ?

The .40 S&W isn't much of an improvement over the 9 MM. Especially today with all of the modern, reliable expanding, high performance self defense ammo that's available out there. It's basically nothing more than a shortened 10 MM, which is a hell of a cartridge. Even a lot of the police departments that bought into the .40 hype in the late 90's, are now going back to the 9 MM.

About all it does do, is give you more recoil, less capacity, and tear up guns faster. It's not that it's "bad". It just doesn't offer much, if any improvement. It has become the proverbial solution to a non existent problem. The ammo is more expensive, albeit not enough to make much of a difference. And during all of the seemingly never ending ammo scares we've been through in the last 7 years, it's been a bit more available. But now with 9 MM Ball dropping back to around $10.00 a box, and pretty much available everywhere, even that incentive is gone.

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk