Author Topic: WWP  (Read 2634 times)

tombogan03884

  • Guest
WWP
« on: December 19, 2014, 01:50:49 PM »
http://clashdaily.com/2012/12/wounded-warrior-project-ceo-confirms-organization-is-anti-gun-and-anti-knife/

Wounded Warrior Project CEO Confirms Organization Is Anti-Gun and Anti-Knife

 Posted on December 10, 2012

Tom Gresham of Gun Talk Radio details the recent revelation that the Wounded Warrior project–a frequent recipient of donations from the firearms industry–is, in fact, anti-gun.

From Gresham:

    Does the Wounded Warrior Project (WWP) have a bias against guns and gun makers?

    Two weeks ago that would have sounded crazy, but this week many shooters are convinced that it’s true. Hundreds of hunts and shoots are held as fundraisers for the WWP, and gun companies donate to WWP for its projects. How could it be that this $185 million (2013 projected revenue) outfit could be anti-gun?

    It started with a simple invitation — I wanted someone from the Wounded Warrior Project to join me for the Veteran’s Day episode of my national radio show, Tom Gresham’s Gun Talk. I had no idea it would turn into a national dustup which now has the gun rights community in a turmoil — so much so that people are burning their Wounded Warrior Project shirts.

    We were disappointed when the Leslie Coleman, PR director for WWP, said they couldn’t come on the show, but that happens. Schedules don’t mesh, things happen, but that’s not uncommon. No big deal. Except that Ms. Coleman said they were declining because we “are related to firearms.”

    “While we appreciate the interest in having a WWP representative on your show on Veterans Day we are not able to participate in interviews or activities with media/organizations that are related to firearms,” said Ms. Coleman in her email.

    That really rocked us because we knew of all the firearms-related activities used to raise money for WWP. I asked for clarification, and Coleman reconfirmed their position. That Sunday I talked about it on the air and sent out a tweet (@guntalk) with the information. Some doubted that I had reported it correctly, so we posted the entire email exchange on our Facebook page.
http://www.facebook.com/notes/gun-talk/wounded-warrior-project-email-exchange/10151354082553313

    That lit the fuse, and hundreds (if not thousands) of gun rights supporters contacted WWP for clarification. The response was . . . a bit bland. Mostly it was along the lines of “We support the Second Amendment . . .,” but the WWP web site specifically called out the firearms industry as one it would not “co-brand” with. That is, it would not allow the use of its logo on guns (and it turns out, on knives, either.)

Read more at fishgame.com

JC5123

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2572
  • Fortune sides with him who dares.
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: WWP
« Reply #1 on: December 19, 2014, 01:58:56 PM »
I stopped even recognizing WWP when their financials went public, and we learned that less than 10% of the donations actually helped wounded veterans. Non-profit my ass. Do they have a booth at SHOT? 
I am a member of my nation's chosen soldiery.
God grant that I may not be found wanting,
that I will not fail this sacred trust.

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: WWP
« Reply #2 on: December 19, 2014, 03:13:09 PM »
I stopped even recognizing WWP when their financials went public, and we learned that less than 10% of the donations actually helped wounded veterans. Non-profit my ass. Do they have a booth at SHOT? 

Does not look like it.

http://shotshow.org/shot-show-2015-exhibitor-list/

Timothy

  • Guest
Re: WWP
« Reply #3 on: December 19, 2014, 04:28:15 PM »
I've never donated to WWP.

I've done a bit of research and most charities don't contribute much to the folks they supposedly represent.  Most of the monies are used to fund the salary of the executives and staff.

From what I've learned, the Salvation Army is one of the best in getting the money to where it needs to go...

Look up the statistics and make your own decision.

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk