The Down Range Forum
Member Section => Politics & RKBA => Topic started by: tombogan03884 on June 04, 2017, 07:41:29 AM
-
F@#k that.
The Europeans don't deserve either one .
They have brought this on themselves and tolerate these continuing attacks with out any attempt at retaliation or holding their politicians responsible.
Want to show support for London ?
Smuggle them some guns and pork chops.
Maybe bacon instead, you can send that in a flat pack like Ikea.
WARNING Continued " tolerance" political correctness and cowardice will bring the same thing here.
-
One of their generals killed like 40 of them and buried them with dead pigs and they left them alone for like 50 years after that.
-
I believe that was one of "OUR" Generals,Pershing that did that during the Moro rebellion.
-
The British in India had a very effective method of dealing with Muslims.
They would march into a valley, use Maxim guns, and artillery on the Ghazi's ,Then trample the crops, fill in the wells and destroy the buildings ,with special attention to the mosque since that was usually where the arms and ammunition were stored.
Then they would march to the next village and repeat, when the Muslim's figured out they were starving out doors for the next year or so they would give up and usually behave for 20 years or so.
-
This article expounds on what I've been trying to say for a while. I just can't seem to get it succinctly down on paper.
https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/islam-facts-or-dreams/ (https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/islam-facts-or-dreams/)
-
Ol' Winston summed up the mentality of these idiots and their view of Islam.....
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." ~ Winston Churchill
-
He had some pretty harsh things to say about Islam as well.
From "The River War"
How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.
A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.
Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.
-
Back in the Iran hostage situation under Carter, I felt it might be good to understand what was driving this and other acts of terrorism and began an informal study of Islam. I have continued that study haphazardly ever since.
At the start, I wondered how accurate the translations of the Koran I had managed to find might be and held what I was learning as a very likely possibility, however, finding so many collaborating references and seeing the actual acts being committed in the name of Islam, I became convinced that what I was finding in references was true.
One aspect that has been left out in link above is the belief that Allah will intervene and assure Islamic victory when Islamic jihadists have engaged and are at war with an overwhelming number of infidels and are in desperate straits. If Allah has not intervened it is because the jihadists are not trying hard enough.
This war will not end until Islam is changed.
I have said before that Muslims must eliminate the Islamic threat from within, or others will from without.
I did see a bit of information that seems to indicate that Muslim leaders are starting to understand that. The Islamic leaders near London have refused the traditional Islam prayers for the terrorist killed....a first.
-
‘Kill them. Kill them all’: GOP congressman calls for war against radical Islamists
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2017/06/05/kill-them-kill-them-all-gop-congressman-calls-for-holy-war-against-radical-islam/?utm_term=.c7a3560cfa7b
The free world... all of Christendom... is at war with Islamic horror. Not one penny of American treasure should be granted to any nation who harbors these heathen animals. Not a single radicalized Islamic suspect should be granted any measure of quarter. Their intended entry to the American homeland should be summarily denied. Every conceivable measure should be engaged to hunt them down. Hunt them, identify them, and kill them. Kill them all. For the sake of all that is good and righteous. Kill them all.
-Captain Clay Higgins
Reached by phone, Higgins told The Washington Post that he was surprised that his message was interpreted by some as hateful or an indictment against Islam — in fact, he said, he didn’t view the post as controversial at all.
He said he was calling for the death of Islamic terrorists, not peaceful Muslims. When he used the word “Christendom,” he said, he was referencing the Western world, not calling for a war between Christianity and Islam. Working in law enforcement, Higgins said, he interacted with people from different faiths and backgrounds and has always respected people based on “what was in their heart.”
“I can tell you that there weren’t many Muslims in that part of Louisiana, but those that I have met have been very cool and very loving,” Higgins said. “Many Muslims are American citizens and I’d give my last life’s blood for any one of them, but that doesn’t mean I’m not going to speak out boldly and from my heart about the threat we face as a nation and as a world.”
-
The only way to eliminate "radical Islam" is to eliminate all Islam since the violence is an inherent part of their culture.
Option #2 is to send an army into their own lands sweeping from end to end with no restraint at all.
Don't execute prisoners, but strike so hard, and so rapidly that they don't get a chance to surrender.
One big atrocity from Syria to Afghanistan , and when you're done don't rebuild anything, no humanitarian aid.
Go out of your way to make the population suffer, destroy crops, fill in wells, target infrastructure that you don't need to wreak further devastation.
And before some sniveler whines about "sinking to their level" I will point out that communication requires a language both sides understand.
-
Perhaps allowing ISIS to form one inclusive Islamic State would have advantages.
Just one nation to declare war upon and no "fly over" or other political permissions to obtain.
-
The only way to eliminate "radical Islam" is to eliminate all Islam since the violence is an inherent part of their culture.
Option #2 is to send an army into their own lands sweeping from end to end with no restraint at all.
Don't execute prisoners, but strike so hard, and so rapidly that they don't get a chance to surrender.
One big atrocity from Syria to Afghanistan , and when you're done don't rebuild anything, no humanitarian aid.
Go out of your way to make the population suffer, destroy crops, fill in wells, target infrastructure that you don't need to wreak further devastation.
And before some sniveler whines about "sinking to their level" I will point out that communication requires a language both sides understand.
There are still infertile fields in Iraq that the Romans salted.
-
The only way to eliminate "radical Islam" is to eliminate all Islam since the violence is an inherent part of their culture.
Option #2 is to send an army into their own lands sweeping from end to end with no restraint at all.
Don't execute prisoners, but strike so hard, and so rapidly that they don't get a chance to surrender.
One big atrocity from Syria to Afghanistan , and when you're done don't rebuild anything, no humanitarian aid.
Go out of your way to make the population suffer, destroy crops, fill in wells, target infrastructure that you don't need to wreak further devastation.
And before some sniveler whines about "sinking to their level" I will point out that communication requires a language both sides understand.
Indeed.
"Sinking to their level" is the ONLY way to defeat them.
Killing more of them than they do of us is the only thing they will understand, because communication is not an option with an enemy unwilling to listen to reason.
You can't leave them alone to themselves when their goal is to conquer the world by any means necessary.
-
Perhaps allowing ISIS to form one inclusive Islamic State would have advantages.
Just one nation to declare war upon and no "fly over" or other political permissions to obtain.
Yeah, that works well.
Google "the Mahdi"
-
When asked what can be done about the Islamic Terrorists, I answer. Kill them all. All Islamists want us dead. All Muslims want us dead. I don't care if you believe me. Learn some Arabic and visit the rag-head owned groceries and convenience stores owned by the Abduls. Don't let them know you speak any Arabic. They openly talk to each other about hating Americans, and about sending money back to 'Palestine' to fight against Israel and the US. I used to think that if we killed enough of them they would quit. I was wrong. We have to kill them all.