<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Down Range Radio 147</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.downrange.tv/blog/down-range-radio-147/1635/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.downrange.tv/blog/down-range-radio-147/1635/</link>
	<description>Guns, Personal Defense and Shooting Sport</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:48:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyle</title>
		<link>http://www.downrange.tv/blog/down-range-radio-147/1635/comment-page-1/#comment-1186</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.downrange.tv/blog/?p=1635#comment-1186</guid>
		<description>FYI; The Merwin Hulbert history page still has a major error in discussing calibers of the time.  We&#039;re being told a 44-100 cartridge would have had 100 grains of black powder.  While some cartridges were designated this way (45-70 for example) that was certainly not universal.  The style of designation (44-100, 32-10, et al) predates the metallic cartridge and simply refers to the approximate diameter (44/100 or 44 one hundredths of an inch) and says nothing of the charge weight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI; The Merwin Hulbert history page still has a major error in discussing calibers of the time.  We&#8217;re being told a 44-100 cartridge would have had 100 grains of black powder.  While some cartridges were designated this way (45-70 for example) that was certainly not universal.  The style of designation (44-100, 32-10, et al) predates the metallic cartridge and simply refers to the approximate diameter (44/100 or 44 one hundredths of an inch) and says nothing of the charge weight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DRTV&#8217;s Weekly Video Podcast #7 &#124; Down Range TV</title>
		<link>http://www.downrange.tv/blog/down-range-radio-147/1635/comment-page-1/#comment-1182</link>
		<dc:creator>DRTV&#8217;s Weekly Video Podcast #7 &#124; Down Range TV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.downrange.tv/blog/?p=1635#comment-1182</guid>
		<description>[...] Down Range Radio #147 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Down Range Radio #147 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

