MEET BRUCE GRAY ON DRTV - CLICK HERE...
Javascript DHTML Drop Down Menu Powered by dhtml-menu-builder.com
Last Updated: Aug 28, 2009 - 10:45:21 AM


How training and experience effect your thinking
By warhawke
Dec 9, 2007 - 4:10:50 PM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page
Advertisement
Recently I have come to realize just how much impact our training, experience and other factors have on how we view our firearms. Everyone is different but some general principles can be seen in the various groups of shooters. Each and every subgroup which makes up the shooting community has its own views and perspectives and we should understand them if we wish to improve ourselves and strengthen our community. Too often we develop an us-versus-them mentality within the shooting community and this hurts the entire gun culture and the it is only through understanding one another that we can come together as a group and face our true enemies. It is with this in mind that I offer my perspective on how we differ. 

I am a survivalist, I was raised to view things through that reality tunnel. As such I look at weapons as a total system, not just the weapons themselves but the parts, magazines, cleaning equipment and everything related to care and use of the weapon I view as a whole. I consider my ability to support the weapon and keep it running without outside help. I look at the weapon in the context of how many jobs it can do for me instead as a specialized instrument designed to do one job superbly. I also choose weapons which can be expected to run with minimal care, not for years, but for generations. The goal of obtaining and training with my weapons is to allow me and those with me to survive without the normal mechanisms of civilized society. My weapons are tools to allow me to master my environment no matter the nature of the challenges I am presented with. 

The collectors see their weapons in a more mechanical and artistic sense. It is the weapon itself, its history, its design that attracts this person. While the collector may well enjoy shooting his possessions he does not see them as tools for controlling his environment but simply to enjoy them as objects. Likewise the target shooter views his weapons as a means of honing and demonstrating his skills, not using those skills in the world outside the range.

The hunter looks first to the game and chooses the weapon accordingly. The rules of hunting call for clear shoots with little obstruction to either observation or shot and will involve an absolute minimum of shots fired. The hunter expects his weapon to function perfectly every time, and given the limited nature of its operation should do so for many years. The hunter sees, not an adversary but a target. Even the most dangerous animal, while the hunter may respect it, has little chance of turning the tables and becoming a threat and none at all of being a threat at a distance.

The armed civilian on the other hand tends to look only at the narrow issue of carrying a handgun concealed on their person. The handgun is their primary (and sometimes only) weapon and they view it as such. You hear questions of finish, weight, size, caliber and effectiveness. You often hear them discuss the issue of carrying several handguns, and even whether spare ammunition should be ignored in favor of other loaded handguns. The ability to hit at a distance, to penetrate hardened targets, to kill large animals, etc. are completely foreign to their way of thinking.

The Law Enforcement Officer (LEO) has an entirely different set of issues (I speak here of regular LEO's, not SWAT or specialized operators). The LEO's job is not to harm or kill, but to subdue and detain. The primary weapon of the LEO is the handgun, but it is just one tool among many. Tasers, pepper-spray, batons and other non-lethal options come before the pistol and the shotgun and patrol rifle come after. To the LEO lethal force is something to be avoided if possible and any action must be limited in scope (no spray-and-pray allowed) and is strictly reactive in nature.

Lastly we have those who have been trained by the military. Military trained personnel are different from all other members of the shooting community in that they are 'Active shooters'. The job of the military is to take the fight to the enemy, even in 'defensive' situations the job is to see the enemy and hit him hard. The soldier is trained to respond to a threat actively and offensively in an environment with little concern for the niceties of civil law, this is not to say that the soldier is lawless or kill happy but rather that the circumstances and environment that they are trained for is so radically different that it cannot be judged by the same standards as the civilian. Once the soldier has reentered civilian life many of these lessons remain and the person tends towards the same type of weapons they used in the military, think of how many former soldiers go on to purchase the civilian versions of their service weapon. Think too of how many times we have heard of former soldiers who act offensively when confronted with violence in the civilian world.

Why is all of this important? Because we in the gun culture often our own worst enemies. We fail to empathize with our fellow gun owners and shooters. Look at the example of Jim Zumbo, a long time hunter and shooter whose complete failure to understand those outside of his personal sub-culture led to others in our community to cast him out and destroy his career. The problem is that most of us are guilty of similar transgressions, albeit not to the same degree and not as publicly. I myself have been guilty of dismissing and disrespecting certain shooters, without understanding that just because I find their activity silly or incomprehensible doesn't make them any less my fellow shooters. We are all in this together and we all have the same enemies. The anti-gunners want all of our guns, not just the pistols or the "assault weapons" or the other specific target of the month. Just because I think dressing up like a cowboy and slinging a sixgun is silly does not make those who enjoy it idiots anymore than my ownership and use of semiautomatic rifles makes me a rampaging psycho. We all need to start trying to see things from the others guys perspective and agreeing to disagree on the details and remember that we must all hang together or we shall surely hang separately.

This post is copied from our forum. Read or make comments here .




© Copyright 2007 by DOWN RANGE TV

Top of Page